When David Hockney, Allen Jones and Gordon Ramsay met for lunch
By Sarah Greenberg
Published on 11 November 2014
In an article from the RA Magazine archive, we find out what happened when two Academicians joined Gordon Ramsay at his Claridge's restaurant.
From the Summer 2004 issue of RA Magazine, issued quarterly to Friends of the RA.
“Let’s raise our glasses to a surreal event,” jokes Allen Jones as he proposes a toast to our unusual lunch-time gathering. He and his fellow Academician David Hockney – the curators of this year’s Summer Exhibition – are huddled around the kitchen table of Gordon Ramsay’s eponymous restaurant in Claridge’s, a short walk from the RA. The award winning photographer Juergen Teller has put his lucrative fashion shoots on hold for a chance to talk to them about art, and snap the event. But the chef, who is preparing a special menu – including a bright orange pumpkin soup inspired by the hues of Allen’s tango dancers and Yorkshire spring lamb in honour of David’s birthplace – is nowhere to be seen. Glasses clink, tummies rumble, dishes speed past to lucky diners elsewhere. Thank heavens for champagne.
The idea had seemed so simple. Bring together three people with a genuine passion for their chosen: two top painters who are selecting the annual summer show and Britain’s most famous three-star chef. Sit them at the 'chef’s table', an enclosure in the middle of the restaurant kitchen, where Gordon and his team create original, one-off meals for the whole table based on the interests and tastes of the diners. Is hanging the RA’s gargantuan show comparable to preparing a feast? Serve food, pour wine, discuss.
But one hour after arriving, there is no food, no chef, and the artists are getting hungry. As we battle for crusts of baguettes to mop up remains of a bowl of truffled foie gras, we talk about art. David and Allen have joined forces to present the Summer Exhibition this year, and in order to make the sprawling annual event more coherent and connect to contemporary ideas, they have organised it around the theme of drawing – a topic about which both artists feel passionately.
“There are still paintings and sculptures and works by amateurs who have sent in pictures, but we see drawing as a leitmotif through the exhibition,” says Allen. “We’re also using the idea of drawing to bring in work from artists who otherwise might not participate, like Tracey Emin and Rachel Whiteread, as well as non-artists who draw, such as the film director Alan Parker and the Nobel Prize-wnning scientist Harry Kroto.
"We look at drawing as visual thinking and we want the work we’re showing to get as close as possible to that creative art, to the point where the eye, hand, and heart meet.”
Allen sees drawing as a mode of thinking, a process of learning about the world around us: “Part of it is realising that there’s no such thing as a mistake. There’s a concept when you’re learning early on that you’re correcting mistakes but inside that’s not what’s actually happening. When you realise that you accept the reality of the marks you’ve made, rather than thinking of it as a false start.”
The best drawings, says David, are not those that are the most finished, but those that are as absorbed as possible – physically and visually – in the moment that they are depicting.
“I used to say to people, ‘I have a reproduction of the best drawing ever made in my pocket’ and I would pull it out and I would convince them, within a minute, that it was the best. It is a Rembrant from the British Museum of a little family teaching a little girl to walk. Everybody at home has a picture like that. The Rembrant, for me, tells me about who you are. I’m looking at the marks and I can feel his arm. That wouldn’t be possible with a photograph – it would be a performance. Rembrant was not intervening in any way, meaning it is the greatest work of art. You don’t see it at first. It is a virtuoso drawing but it doesn’t shout out.”
So in this age of digital manipulation, can photographs lie and drawings, which seem much more subjective, present the truth? In a way, yes, argues David. “Once photography has lost its veracity which, as far as I can see, it does when it loses the chemicals, we don’t know what the effects will be. In my lecture, I’ll point out the painting by Goya, The Third of May, 1808. There are French soldiers shooting a prisoner, and the guy is holding up his hand. Well Goya never saw the event. It was described to him and he painted it about two years later. Nevertheless, it contains obvious truths that a photographer couldn’t have caught because it would have had to have been on the side of the officials. But the painter, with imagination, can recreate it, and that still applies today. But television won’t tell you that. They claim they’re showing you the war.”
“Isn’t the subtitle of your talk ‘Why the twentieth century didn’t need an Academy’?” asks Allen. “The nineteenth century did, the twentieth didn’t… and the twenty-first will!” declares David. “Because of what’s happening to photography. It’s going more towards painting and I assume it will go even more. The argument is that photography is a documentary thing – which it can be – but if it is photographing something that is three-dimensional, then it has to have a point of view.”
It seems appropriate that Juergen has brought nothing but his old-fashioned 35mm to the table. No fancy lenses or light filters. The idea is to capture the raw experience of the kitchen. We look around and smell the aromas, growing ever more curious about the whirl of activity surrounding us. “What happens in this kitchen?” asks Allen, “I quite like the idea that we sit here and watch all this, although I don’t know if it’s good for one’s digestion.”
Lunch at Claridge's
Juergen Teller documents a lunch meeting between Allen Jones, David Hockney and Gordon Ramsay
Allen Jones, David Hockney and Gordon Ramsay shared this feast of steak and spring vegetables at a lunch meeting in 2004
As if on cue, Gordon bursts in with an expression of nervous tension that television never quite captures, as if the formidable chef may just be a bit awed by the artists. “Good, everybody’s here. Are you happy? Every customer’s a critic- I suppose pretty much like your work. What I’m finding difficult, now at the age of 37, is trying to keep everyone happy. Somebody asked me last week on the radio what I love, and I said: “criticism”. I never want to believe that I’ve got it, and everything is perfect. You’ve got to take criticism on board and ten years ago I couldn’t but now, at 37, I can.”
Reality TV seems to intrude on real life, as he quickly launches into another manic monologue about filming two television series, managing his one-star restaurant in Chelsea. “Well anyway, I’m very impressed with both of your work,” he says addressing Allen and David. “I’m not yet in a position to buy them, but maybe one day I may be able to.”
In all of his cookbooks and media appearances, Gordon talks about the importance of pleasure – of impressing people but also making them happy with food. “Both cooking and painting bring pleasure to their audience,” says Gordon, but for him the visual comes last. “Before anything happens, we need the high concentration of flavours. So all the kitchen staff put on blindfolds and taste things. I want a mind-blowing experience of the palate. Food can look beautiful, but if it doesn’t taste stunning it’s an anti-climax. We’ve got to be careful about finding that balance.”
As a young chef arrives bearing dainty bowls of roast pumpkin soup, Gordon explains how the dish was prepared to concentrate the flavour. The only possible response is to nod and slurp happily as he continues. “Living in France for three years was crucial for me to develop as a chef. I got inside every ounce of ingredient. To get inside a celeriac, to understand what the artichoke is, to understand what purple basil meant and how it should be cooked and what it gave me back – that respect and love for food was so natural there.”
As he speaks, he watches us like and interrogator, checking to make sure we are savouring every nuance of flavour, which of course we are. But neither David nor Allen belongs to the generation of British men brought up to express such enthusiasm, so they murmur “Mmm” and clear their plates without much fuss.
One senses that this is not what Gordon wants for a response, but he continues, “Another way the world of art is compatible with the world of cooking,” he says, “is that we never have the same day. Whether it’s an insight, a flashback, a memory of something explosive you’re dying to do.”
What does he think of the fact that his creations get gobbled up every day? Does he see his art as ephemeral?
“Most art is ephemeral,” notes David. “It’s a good job it is, or we’d be up to our neck in it.” But does David ever think back at a painting that he’s sold and want to look at it again? “No. To be honest, I’ve never quite understood art collecting. I can understand putting pictures on a wall, but beyond that I don’t get it.’ “I suppose collecting is about possession,” says Allen. “The first time I went to a major collector’s house it was Ted Powers’ place in Grosvenor Square. There were wonderful pictures on the wall like we’d have library books. He’d open another bedroom door, and you’d think, ‘What do you do, change them monthly?’ But the act of possession is actually it.”
For Gordon, possession isn’t an issue. He watches his creations disappear every day. “It’s weird because when we have Japanese clients, the first thing they do is take a picture of their food. They want to hold it in their memory. To me it’s the flavour that captures the memory, that can be held for years, whereas the visual impact might last for only 30 seconds.”
Gordon is presenting his mantra of flavour on his current TV show, Gordon Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmares, in which he descends upon failing restaurants and tries to turn them round. The biggest challenge he faces is chefs who literally over-egg the pudding with complicated concoctions. “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing – it can become lethal.”
“It’s not unlike dealing with the submissions to the Summer Exhibition,” Allen comments. “We’ve just spent four days looking at 10,000 works entered for it. They come through like fire buckets. The students stand in line and pass this stuff through. You have a second to look at each work and nothing escapes that is worth looking at.”
“How quickly can you spot talent? Is it instant?” asks Gordon.
“Yes. It’s nothing to do with personal taste, just to do with someone who is speaking intelligently in the language they’ve chosen to use.”
Just as a dialogue starts to develop, Gordon announces abruptly that he has to leave. As Juergen gets up from the table to take a group portrait before he goes, something in Gordon snaps. Suddenly he turns to the photographer, obviously annoyed that he hasn’t been taking more pictures. His colourful character (and language) comes to the fore and he concludes his outburst by saying, “I know you’re busy eating lunch but you’re the only photographer I’ve ever known who sits down for six courses.” Oh no. We are witnessing our very own ‘Gordon Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmare’. The redoubtable chef is living up to his reputation as a bully, which may be amusing on TV but can be terrifying in real life. A nasty scene might have ensued but Juergen handles it coolly. After all, he’s used to working with supermodels.
Fortunately, marinated tuna loins arrive in the nick of time. “Mmm, delicious,” intone David and Allen nervously.
“Just look at me,” says Juergen, focusing the camera.
“Please. You’re welcome,” retorts Gordon, as the shutter snaps.
“Thank you,” says Juergen, as the chef exits stage right.
“He’s a total enthusiast, isn’t he,” smiles David. If the group portrait here looks like the chef wants to punch the photographer, it has captured the moment. Once Gordon’s gone, we all relax and pass the family-style dishes around the table. Juergen practically inhales the truffle-infused mashed potatoes, appetite unimpaired by the recent tantrum. David quizzes him about photography, Allen asks about his upcoming show of nude self-portraits with Charlotte Rampling. Puddings are devoured amid a flurry of spoons darting back and forth across the table.
Do I worry that Gordon might ban me from his restaurants for revealing the truth of his tantrums, as he has banned certain irreverent food critics? Notionally, yes. Despite his moment of moodiness, he arranged for his tireless staff to prepare a delicious, one-of-a-kind lunch, His use of truffles makes you understand why men forage with pigs to find them, and his ‘chef’s table’ creates edible performance art. But his menu lacked the vital ingredient essential to any great meal – good humour. Luckily David and Allen possess more than enough to make up for it. When I run into them as they hang the Summer Exhibition a few weeks later, they are still chuckling about our lunch. David quips “Too many chefs…” and Allen chimes in “…on television”.
Allen Jones RA is at the Royal Academy, Burlington Gardens, from 13 November – 25 January 2015.
Sarah Greenberg is the former Editor of RA Magazine.
Enjoyed this article?
As well as free entry to all of our exhibitions, Friends of the RA enjoy one of Britain’s most respected art magazines, delivered directly to your door.
Why not join the club?
Related articles
A love letter to the gallery gift shop
18 November 2024
Painting the town: Florence in 1504
15 November 2024
Moving a masterpiece
7 November 2024
