Note.
The students work hard; the ladies are intelligent;
and I think quite justify the increased facilities given
them under the new rules. The men, on the whole,
are not strong; they lack initiative and artistic
insight; and I fear that we do not get the ablest
men students of the country in the schools, as we should do.
This is possibly due to two things; the nature of the
admission tests, and the system of visitors. In every
art school, when a student wishes to qualify for the R.A.
schools, he is “prepared” for it, so that it becomes to
some extent a special thing, apart from his ordinary work _
_ even a matter of “cramming” _ and it is not always
the ablest students who will, or can, do this
successfully. (There are in the schools now, students who
have passed the tests, but yet cannot set up a head or
a figure intelligently). I venture to think that better
students would be chosen, if some test could be im-
posed which did not lend itself to cramming, for
example, that they should submit a number of
their works; something done in the ordinary course of
study.
I trust I may be excused if in criticising the
system of visitors, I am exceeding my privilege_ It is
a system not followed in any other school: one which
no one would impose in any other art or profession_ It is
illogical. The student does not assimilate all the
over